Skip to content

Maybe They Should Have Called It the "Unaffordable" Care Act

Share this Story on Facebook, X, Text, LinkedIn, Gmail, Yahoo Mail, or Outlook

Josh Dent is an early victim of Obamacare. The lanky, shaven-headed machine operator likes the medical insurance plan that his employer, Acorn Signs, provides him. But under the newly enacted Affordable Care Act, his insurance policy will get less affordable. A provision in the law is putting his insurance company out of business, and whatever replaces Dent’s current policy will likely be much more expensive.

The way the 29-year-old sees it, Acorn Signs will have to cut benefits or cut pay. One way or another, he figures, the switch to a new insurer will cost him.
Steve Gillispie, Acorn’s president, is distressed by this unexpected development. A year-and-a-half ago, he was facing premiums of $150,000 from an established insurer, up from $80,000 only three years before. Then along came Richmond, Virginia-based nHealth. The start-up company, launched with the mission of making consumer-driven health care a reality, rescued him with a plan that kept premiums below $90,000 yearly. The plan insured his 35 employees against hospital expenses, created a $1,500 deductible for doctors’ fees, and set up Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) for employees to pay for what the health plan did not. “For most employees,” says Gillispie, “it netted out money in the pocket.”

Lower insurance charges helped Acorn survive the recession without laying off any of its employees or cutting their compensation. Going back hat in hand to one of the dominant insurers in town, Gillispie fears, will add tens of thousands of dollars to his cost structure. Profit margins are tight in this slow-growth economy, but he hates to pass on the higher insurance costs to his employees, many of whom are paid $14 to $16 an hour. “Most of these people are living hand to mouth as it is,” he says. He still does not know what he will do.

Such is the unintended consequence of Obamacare, which overhauled the health care industry with the goal of making medical insurance more affordable and accessible to all. The provision that is causing Acorn Signs so much heartache is the so-called 80/20 rule, which requires all insurance plans to pay out at least 80 percent of premiums in benefits. The thinking behind the rule is to punish insurers that let administrative expenses get out of hand. In practice, the law punishes innovative, entrepreneurial companies like nHealth that kept premiums low.

The company ran afoul of the 80/20 rule by charging premiums that were so low that the administrative expenses looked high by comparison. Alan Slabaugh, a benefits specialist who brokers the policy, explains the problem this way, using very rough numbers: If a traditional insurer bills $500 monthly per employee, paying out $400 in benefits and charging $100 to administration, its administrative ratio is 20 percent — acceptable under the 80/20 rule. nHealth keeps premiums low by using HSAs to incentivize employees to reduce their spending – buying generic drugs, for instance, and shopping around for cheaper pharmacies – and by showing clients how to self-insure for physicians’ fees. If nHealth charges super-low premiums of $300 per month, paying $200 in benefits and keeping $100 for administrative expenses, its administrative ratio would be 33 percent – thus failing the Obamacare test and triggering penalties.

In its short existence, nHealth passed the market test with flying colors, signing up 128 clients across Virginia. However, the fast-growth company was still burning cash when Obamacare passed and management wasn’t expecting to be profitable for several years. The 80/20 rule attacked the company’s business model and pushed the break-even point out another year or more. Given continued uncertainties about how the regulations would be written, the company notified clients in June that the board had decided to shut the company down; it would honor all existing contracts but not renew them.
Some 2,500 Virginia employees are the losers. Other insurers in the Richmond marketplace offer HSAs, says Slabaugh, but none are as inexpensive as nHealth’s. Workers will wind up paying more for insurance – assuming their employers can even afford to continue providing insurance at the rates the big insurers charge. Even non-customers pay a price indirectly. With one of Virginia’s most aggressive and innovative insurers knocked out of action, the dominant players don’t have to compete as hard for their business.

Only a few months out of the gate, Obamacare is falling far short of the lofty goals set for it. As Slabaugh says, “The health care reform bill was passed with the intention to increase choice and decrease the costs associated with health care. As the legislation is being implemented, I am witnessing quite the opposite and nHealth is just one example.”

A version of this article appeared in the Washington Times.

Share this Story on Facebook, X, Text, LinkedIn, Gmail, Yahoo Mail, or Outlook

Join Our Email List

Sign me up for:
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.